The Copperwood Mine:

threatening Lake Superior’s vitality for sulfide waste mining

The Copperwood Project is a proposed copper sulfide mine at the juncture of Porcupine Mountains State Park, the North Country Trail, and Lake Superior. It would be the closest sulfide mine to Lake Superior in history, with plans to mine up to 100 feet from the lake’s surface. Copperwood plans to host operations directly adjacent to the Presque Isle Scenic Area, clearcutting many acres of forest and filling over 60 acres of wetlands.

Take Action! Take Action! Take Action!

Copperwood is seeking taxpayer dollars in order to move forward with site preparation and infrastructure. We've compiled a list of action items you can take right now to put pressure on lawmakers and help prevent public funding for the Copperwood Mine:

Step One: Quick & Easy Actions
Step Two: Medium Effort Actions
Step Three: Most Effort Actions
Fall colors at Porcupine Mountains State Park light the forest golden yellow. Photo courtesy Jane Fitkin.
Fall colors at Porcupine Mountains State Park. Photo courtesy Jane Fitkin.
foamy water flows through conifer forest down the Presque Isle River toward Lake Superior. Photo courtesy Tom Grotewohl
foamy water flows through conifer forest down the Presque Isle River toward Lake Superior. Photo courtesy Tom Grotewohl
Sunset on Lake Superior near the Presque Isle Rivermouth. Photo courtesy Tom Grotewohl
Sunset on Lake Superior near the Presque Isle Rivermouth. Photo courtesy Tom Grotewohl
Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is blessed with spectacular access to outdoor recreation opportunities and abundant freshwater.

A few ways in which these characteristics are showcased are through Porcupine Mountains State Park, located on Lake Superior near Ontonagon, and the North Country Trail, the longest National Scenic Trail in the US and a recently designated piece of the National Parks System. Unfortunately, with natural beauty also often comes resource extraction, and the Superior watershed has been plagued with more than its fair share of mines, logging operations, and more.

This map shows Copperwood's location (purple, green, blue, black) and proximity to Porcupine Mountains State Park and Lake Superior. Map courtesy Orvana Minerals (previous owner of the Copperwood project).
This map shows Copperwood's location (purple, green, blue, black) and proximity to Porcupine Mountains State Park and Lake Superior. Map courtesy Orvana Minerals (previous owner of the Copperwood project).
This overall site plan shows Copperwood's proximity to both Lake Superior (top left) and the North Country Trail (bottom, just south of Tailing Disposal Facility). The company plans to mine beneath Porcupine Mountains State Park and host surface operations just west of the park (not pictured).
This overall site plan shows Copperwood's proximity to both Lake Superior (top left) and the North Country Trail (bottom, just south of Tailing Disposal Facility). The company plans to mine beneath Porcupine Mountains State Park and host surface operations just west of the park (not pictured). Map courtesy Highland Copper Gypsy Creek Wetland Mitigation Plans, page 2

The proposed mine’s average ore grade is only 1.5%, which means that 1.5% of what they pull out if the ground will be copper, and the rest will be sulfide-bearing mine waste that will need to be stored, onsite, permanently. To do so, the mining company is currently destroying wetlands to construct a 320-acre tailings pond to hold the waste, which will sit approximately 2 miles from the Lake Superior shoreline on terrain sloping toward the lake.

Further, the immediate area in Ontonagon and Gogebic counties has seen two separate severe, 1-in-1,000-year storms in the past decade which have caused significant damage to roads, bridges, and infrastructure (1, 2). This tailings pond is designed to withstand only 1-in-100-year storms (see comment 52), which are much less severe; this makes a rupture of the tailings dam very likely to fail.

When the dam breaks, the mine waste will reach Lake Superior within minutes.

This model from the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) shows the path of destruction when the eastern portion of the dam collapses.

This model from the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission shows the path of tailings flow and depth if just the eastern portion of the dam was to fail. Mine waste would reach the Presque Isle River and Gypsy Creek in minutes, to be followed by Lake Superior.
This model from the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission shows the path of tailings flow and depth if just the eastern portion of the dam was to fail. Mine waste would reach the Presque Isle River and Gypsy Creek in minutes, to be followed by Lake Superior.
Even if the dam doesn’t rupture, pollution from sulfide mines isn’t the exception – it’s the rule. There has never been a sulfide mine that has not contaminated neighboring water sources.

 A study done in 2012 found that, of the 14 copper sulfide mines producing nearly all copper in the United States, 92% failed to contain seepage, and every single one spilled toxic waste into the surrounding environment. Some like to refer to Marquette County’s Eagle Mine as the model for environmentally sound mining, yet even Eagle Mine has experienced spills and several instances of high levels of chronic wastewater toxicity.

Copperwood presents a clear threat to Lake Superior. Luckily, the mine currently lacks about 95% of its funding; Highland Copper currently needs $425 million to build the mine, but only has around $20 million in the bank.

Highland Copper was considered for a $50 million taxpayer-funded grant from the Michigan Strategic Fund's SOAR fund in 2024. That grant made it through the MSF, but was halted twice by the Michigan Senate Appropriations Committee due to massive public opposition and the corporate handout nature of the funding. This grant expires in September 2025. 

Reeling from their continued underperformance in the private investor market, Copperwood Mine proponents are pushing harder than ever to use our state and federal taxpayer money to fund this dangerous project. 

In April 2025, Rep. Greg Markkanen (R-Hancock) sponsored a budget earmark request for the same amount as the SOAR grant, for the same project, but addressed to Wakefield Township instead to obscure the purpose of the funding. This request is currently being considered by a Michigan House Appropriations subcommittee; tell them it keep it out of the budget!

As of summer 2025, Highland Copper is also retaining at least 5 federal lobbyists to look for Copperwood funding in Washington, D.C. Make sure your reps know how you feel about that!

Copperwood’s lack of funding is their weakest point, and how our opposition can be successful. Complete the action items at the top of this page to voice your opposition to the project and show investors and state authorities that we won't stand for the destruction of our lakeshore. 

For more information about the Copperwood Mine's impact and how it will, if built, affect our environment, economic and cultural wellbeing, visit our partners at Protecttheporkies.com. Make sure you're on both of our mailing lists to stay updated about this and other issues facing the Superior watershed.